When I read articles and press
releases, I read with a concern or jaundiced eye to the factual
information and what the strengths and weaknesses may be and may mean
to the value of the information published. This is sometimes
impossible or nearly so because of the information released. What is
being hidden behind the pay wall and how accessible is a contact to
receive a copy. As a patient, sometimes the information is easily
available and at other times, extensive research is required. I
don't mind the research, but at times, I find it a complete waste of
time, as the full information is just as poor as the press release.
That is why when I read this; I almost
did not believe what I was reading. A doctor writing an article
about endocrinology that was not a study, but in fact was his
opinion. The topic is well chosen and his observation is great,
until he writes his list. I will not begrudge most of his efforts
since he has chosen the low-tech side of the issue. Choosing wisely
has for the most part been on the high tech side and is very
interesting in the tests that we need to be watchful of letting our
doctors and hospitals do too many of these tests when simpler or less
expensive procedures will yield the same results.
I can agree with most of his low-tech
reductions for cost savings. I will list his points and comment
where I disagree – which I do on one item and I hope you will
agree.
I would encourage you to read the
entire article as Dr. Plotzker has some solid points.
My Top 5 List of Excessive
Practices
1. Any test of any type that is
already in an accessible record does not need to be repeated unless
something has happened to that patient that might alter his or her
medical status.
2. When a person comes in with
weight loss and palpitations, a TSH should be measured before going
on a tumor hunt or doing sophisticated cardiac studies.
3. A hemoglobin A1c measured a
day or two after a packed red blood cell (RBC) transfusion misleads
more than it contributes.
4. Many patients with diabetes
test their blood glucose excessively, leading to overuse and
unnecessary costs of test strips.
5. Finally, there's a phenomenon
that I like to call consultorrhea, or excessive consulting.
I could nit-pick some points in all of
Dr. Plotzker's points above, but the one that I feel he is wrong
about is number 4. He does have a decent grasp on the topic, but
with the problems many people with all types of diabetes encounter in
obtaining a sufficient number of test strips, he should not be
another one. I feel this doctor is one more obstacle to overcome by
patients that should be allowed more test strips.
The example he chooses to use may be
true, but there are those people in the early months following
diagnosis that need to be able to test, test, and maybe retest quite
often. I finally located my testing records from the first year, and
I was a little shocked at how often I did test. The first four
months I averaged eight tests per day on two oral medications. And
yes, when I transferred to insulin, I continued but my average
increased to 10 times per day. Then in the fifth month of using
insulin, my average decreased to eight times and then I leveled off
at about five times per day. I had several times a month that I
would be at 10 or more in a day and I was happy to see my notes. A
couple of times when I knew I would have a low because of a mistake,
either in over estimating carbs, or injecting too much insulin.
Other times the extra testing was because I added a new to me food
and wanted to check my results for several days to be confident in
the quantity I was eating. Thankfully, I had my food logs as well.
Because of Medicare and their testing
strip limit, many type 2 patients cannot obtain extra test strips
when they need them and most insurance companies follow the lead of
Medicare. Our own American Diabetes Association and Joslin Diabetes
Center may have much to do with the limits on test strips when they
state that certain type 2 patients probably don't need to test. They
ignore the fact that most oral medications can cause hypoglycemia and
that is when extra test strips become invaluable. I don't have that
many episodes of hypoglycemia, but I can use a lot of test strips
when I do have an episode, especially on insulin.
I have no evidence and only
speculation, when I say that it is possible that many elderly deaths
may be caused by hypoglycemic episodes. Because these elderly often
live alone, their deaths are listed as heart failure and no mention
is made for secondary causes.
Recently, a ten member panel of
“experts” in different aspects of hypoglycemia, five from the ADA
and five from The Endocrine Society. I have not finished my blog on
this yet, but it does recognize hypoglycemia from oral medications.
It also has advice for clinical use.
I know that I'm coming at this from a slightly different perspective (type 1 vs. type 2), but I very much agree with you that there are many factors that might make more frequent testing necessary at times.
ReplyDelete